Image Posted on Updated on
Conference: Attaining the Sustainable Development Goals – Environmental Law, Policy and Management, Nov 9 to 11 @ NUS
Dates: 9 – 11 November 2016
Time: 8:30am to 6:00pm
Venue: Shaw Foundation Alumni House Auditorium
National University of Singapore, 11 Kent Ridge Drive, Singapore 119244
Please find appended the full conference programme and registration brochure. Registration and payment can also be made online at www.sdgsconf.sg.
Kindly note that the 4th Asia Environment Lecture is complimentary, but registration is required via https://intranet.sde.nus.edu.sg/MemConfSys/.
Not just the humanities but also in 2017, a prestigious science journal giving attention to Ecology with a new journal (but sharing the spot with Evolution).: https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2015/11/16/nature-to-launch-new-ecology-and-evolution-journal/
By Aaron Vansintjan.*
Talk about the Anthropocene often has a tendency to rely on apolitical and colonialist assumptions. But the turn to ecology in the humanities will require acknowledging—and, more importantly, supporting—those peoples who have never turned their back on ‘ecology’ in the first place.
View original post 1,536 more words
An interesting read on democratizing science policy and advice from 2005. David Guston is based at Arizona State University where he is the founding director of the School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Director at the Center for Nanotechnology in Society, Co-Director at the Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes and Professor in the Department of Political Science, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences
“Democratizing science does not mean settling questions about Nature by plebiscite, any more than democratizing politics means setting the prime rate by referendum. What democratization does mean, in science as elsewhere, is creating institutions and practices that fully incorporate principles of accessibility, transparency, and accountability. It means considering the societal outcomes of research at least as attentively as the scientific and technological outputs. It means insisting that in addition to being rigorous, science be popular, relevant, and participatory.”
I don’t quite agree with him that science should be popular but otherwise, he makes excellent points that are summarized here:
- Engage user communities and lay citizens more fully in review of funding applications.
- Increase support for community-initiated research at universities and other research institutions.
- Restructure programs in the ethical, legal, and societal implications (ELSI) of research. If ELSI programs, such as those funded with the genome or nanotechnology initiatives, are to facilitate democratic politics and improve the societal impacts of knowledge-based innovation, they need to meet two criteria. First, they must extend into research areas that have not already been designated for billion-dollar public investments.[…]Second, ELSI research must be more directly plugged back into the policy process.
- Increase the opportunities for analysis, assessment, and advice-giving through the use of deliberative polling, citizens’ panels, and other participatory mechanisms.
To read the entire article: http://issues.org/21-1/p_guston-3/
Image Posted on Updated on
The Terra Viva Grants Directory develops and manages information about grants for agriculture, energy, environment, and natural resources in the world’s developing countries.
International Grantmakers: Postings from over 500 grant makers, with regional coverage for the developing world.
Funding News: Application deadlines by months, subject areas, and forms of grant support.
Links and Resources: A strategic inclusion of information resources for grant seekers.
For grants on Biodiversity, Conservation and Wildlife: http://terravivagrants.org/category/biodiversity-conservation-wildlife/